Categories
consultations Education NNPCF work Parent Carer Forums Support for CYP with SEND

NNPCF response to the call for 100% school attendance in September

Dozens of SEND families responded to our call for evidence. They told us that the lack of support in school means that their children find it impossible to attend school regularly

Following the Children’s Commissioners ‘Voices of England’s Missing Children – The findings of the Children’s Commissioner’s Attendance Audit June 2022’ that was published on 26 June, we launched a call for evidence to collect parent carers experiences on their child’s school attendance.

You can find the report and our initial response by following this link: Children’s Commissioner’s Attendance Audit – National Network of Parent Carer Forums C.I.C (nnpcf.org.uk)

When the audit report was released, it stated that 100% of children must attend school on the first day back in September. 

Unfortunately, the report was not well received within our community. Many parents felt that, in a lot of cases, children were missing education through no fault of their own, due to lack of support and understanding within their school.

We asked parent carers, whose children were not attending school, to share their experiences with us.

Despite only limited publicity we received dozens of responses. 

In most cases, parents describe situations where their child wants to attend school, but because their concerns are not listened to, and there is inadequate or no support in place, they are unable to do so.

Too often, parents describe their children as becoming suicidal when they were forced to attend without the correct understanding and support: 

“By the end of year 6 he was 3 years behind in his learning, but school had not picked up on this. He had spent so much time in emotional turmoil in school he learnt nothing. He went to high school and lasted 3 months. Due to Covid SATs had not taken place and primary school failed to inform high school of his struggles both emotionally and academically. He expressed his wish to die and he was suicidal. High school failed to recognise this despite me pleading for help. They told me all Sen children say they want to die but none act on it. My son attempted suicide 3 times before we received any support from school or CAMHS.” 

“Decision makers showing compassion, after an overdose was taken by my child, they didn’t even ask if we were ok. Straight into risk assessments and how our child would no longer be allowed to go to the toilet on her own. We were dismissed, patronised, ignored with little co-operation from senior leaders/decision makers” 

“She started suffering from anxiety around school at the end of year 5 when they first took mock SATS. Year 6 was difficult but school did not recognise her anxiety… The end of year 6 was the first time she was admitted to hospital for suicidal behaviour. The new school however chose to ignore the provision summary. They did not accept my daughter’s needs. By November, she was admitted to hospital again” 

“Primary school refused to listen to our concerns which we started to raise in Year 1. No help from health services for mental health despite us reporting from age 6 that she was highly distressed and saying she wanted to die… Primary school treated her school anxiety and distress as an attendance issue and offered no support to deal with bullying or reasonable adjustments. Headteacher repeatedly tried to strong arm us into sending her to school only two weeks after a serious mental health crisis.” 

The lens approach to the findings are as follows

We asked ‘is your child in Primary, secondary, specialist, independent or college or not placed’ 44% of all respondents said Secondary

When asked

  • is your child on a reduced timetable
  • is someone educating them at home (with school supplied learning or EOTAS) or
  • or home educating that is not selective/elected

Our respondents told us of their children’s part-time timetables. 

One parent told us that their child, who is in a mainstream primary, only attends school 8 hours per week at an alternative provision which was provided by the school where the child is on roll. 

Another parent reported that their child at a mainstream secondary school attends mornings only. This was after experiencing and receiving school related trauma from CAMHS, when the child was attending primary school.

This case is not in isolation, other parents have had similar experiences, with many children not receiving any education at all. 

Parents were also asked how long their child’s attendance had been affected. The range was 8 months to 9 years, with 63% respondents saying that their child’s attendance had been affected for more than a year

We then asked ‘what things or chain of events had got them to where they are now?’ 79% of respondents said it was school. Some of the issues they reported were: 

  • Lack of support from Key leaders in school 
  • Lack of diagnosis so schools could appropriately support 
  • Lack of evidence for an EHCP – therefore specialist support couldn’t be put into place 
  • Poor communication
  • Poor knowledge by teachers in regard to SEN 
  • Schools couldn’t meet the needs of the children 
  • Lack of training 
  • Poor or no transitions 

In line with our solution focused way of working, we asked ‘what could have made it different?’

66% responded with school, the main points being: 

  • Suitable placements/provision being available in local area 
  • no exclusions
  • an acknowledgement of needs 
  • earlier intervention 
  • believing medical evidence when presented 
  • meet legal obligations 
  • updating school records and staff reading them 
  • more awareness of anxiety and mental health. 

We asked parents ‘what did they want for their child?’

41% responded said school in their response.

Not surprisingly, all parents said that they wanted their child to be happy. And almost every parent said that they wanted an education for their child.

Some parents commented that they knew what their child wanted to do as a career. 

Our final question asked about the needs of their child.

54% responded that their children had anxiety. With a lot of parents waiting for a formal diagnosis of Autism or ADHD. 

Below you can read more quotes from the responses we received. This illustrates the situations that our families continue to experience: 

“Anxiety (presenting as stomach aches), medical investigations, bullying at school.  Pandemic showed up existing issues more clearly.  Occasional absences which became more frequent, no support from school without diagnosis and long waiting lists for help.  Full school phobia (panic attacks and suicidal ideation) then threats of fines and prison were the last straw.” 

“X developed serious mental health issues at start of final lockdown after walking past previous primary school and experiencing a flashback and panic attack, which led to further eating issues requiring [received] dietician input after dropping 2 centiles and losing 2&1/2 stone. Told he has experienced school related trauma by CAMHS but no further help or support.” 

“He needed somewhere that understood anxiety, there’s no placements that have that ability unless very rare spaces become available. Lack of suitable education has failed him.” 

“School failed our child who has significant disabilities and SEN, couldn’t meet needs, child was on a part time timetable. Head teacher didn’t believe our child is disabled (two specialist teachers told me the head teacher kept calling them to check/ask/clarify) and was a nightmare to deal with!” 

“Anxiety for my daughter (15) started at the beginning of Year 10 – Sept 2021. School were unsupportive – offering to support attendance but nothing to actually support mental health. Year Head was dismissive and access to SEMH/ABSA support was initially blocked/denied. Pressure from school about attendance and refusal to authorise absence to a mental health ‘crisis’. Evidence from GP and CAMHS was provided & then School reconsidered. They then offered Early Help – May this year (several months too late)” 

“I wanted him to be able to go to school and be happy. But now I want him to receive funded EOTAS via tutors etc. We are currently funding this ourselves on top of me having to quit my senior management job in the NHS to care for him.” 

“No one was interested in what was best for my child. They only were bothered about their school. The research is really clear, that children with Down Syndrome will reach better academic outcomes in mainstream school. Article 24 of the UNCRPD also says children have the right to a mainstream education. The law though, gives the schools the right to refuse. The LA insisted on consulting with special schools, even though they knew they would end up losing at tribunal if they named one.” 

“[We wanted] Compassion, empathy and understanding from school, not judgment and threats. Proper, consistent SEN support, not stop-start interventions, that were what my child described as ‘the wrong help.’ After access to diagnosis, listening to parents and our child, instead of dismissing concerns. Prevention of bullying of SEND children.” 

“[We want]To be healthy, happy and enjoy life. An education in a system which appreciates and accepts them for who they are and what they are capable of.” 

Categories
consultations Department for Education NNPCF work SEND Review

NNPCF response to the SEND Green Paper and Alternative Provision consultation.

The NNPCF ‘s consultation response has been submitted today 22 July.

Our response has been extensively coproduced with parent carers:

  • We ran a survey for all parents which received nearly 1300 responses – parents gave us a very strong steer on the key issues. We will publish the results of this survey in full.
  • We ran a webinar on 11 July to share the interim results from the survey with our membership – you can watch this webinar here: Find out what parent carers have told us about the SEND Green Paper and coproduce the NNPCF consulta – YouTube
  • We have hosted many regional events over the last 15 weeks with parent carer forums – some with the DfE team in attendance and some exclusively for parent carer forums.

We focussed our responses on those areas that will directly impact service delivery to families because this was where we got the most and the strongest responses from parent carers. We touch upon those areas that deal more with the structure.

In addition to this formal consultation response, we have had regular dialogue with the DfE about the Green Paper proposals where we have continued to make the key points in our consultation response:

  • NNPCF co-chairs, Tina Emery and Mrunal Sisodia continue to be members of the SEND review steering group which has met twice during the consultation period.
  • Senior civil servants from the DfE attended the webinar we held on the 11 July (see link above)
  • We have meetings scheduled over the coming weeks with the DfE to further analyse the results of our survey

We will continue to update you on the progress of the Green Paper as we have more information.

You can download our response here: https://consult.education.gov.uk/send-review-division/send-review-2022/consultation/my_response?user_id=ANON-EXGA-GCYM-N&key=4e7902bd78ecf85c7a57aa2ee04102bde9ae9802

Below you can find the responses we received to our SEND review survey, which informed the response we submitted to the Green Paper consultation.

Categories
Department for Education Government Minister for children and families

Confirmation of Ministerial changes

The last few weeks have been very turbulent for the government with Boris Johnson standing down once a new Prime Minister (PM) has been voted in by the Conservative party.

As you will know , Will Quince stood down from his Ministerial role of Children and Families Minister.

This caused a lot of questions regarding the Green Paper Send review, including whether the review would be continued, postponed, or concluded early.

We have now received confirmation from our colleagues at the Department for Education (DfE) that Will Quince has accepted a new position in the government as the Minister for School Standards which includes SEND and the SEND and AP Green Paper.

This gives the new government ministerial continuity, which of course we are very pleased to hear, however, we know there will be more changes once the PM is appointed.

The responsibilities of Minister Will Quince can be found on the government website:

https://www.gov.uk/government/ministers/minister-of-state-for-school-standards

The Alternative Provision (AP) brief is with Brendan Clarke-Smith, Minister for Children and Families, who will be working closely with the DfE team to ensure the links work with Alternative Provision and the wider children and families agenda.

Knowing this information, we would encourage you to complete the SEND Green paper review, https://consult.education.gov.uk/send-review-division/send- review-2022/ which remains open until 22 July 11.45 pm

Our own NNPCF SEND green paper review survey closes next week too, there is still time to get involved:  https://bit.ly/NNPCFGPAP

Categories
Bills and legislations Department for Education NNPCF Steering Group white paper

NNPCF Meeting with DfE Schools White Paper Team

Last week, members of the NNPCF steering group and management team met with officials from the Department for Education working on the Schools White Paper.

The DfE team covered the main tenants of the Bill outlined here Schools Bill: policy statements – GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)

Key amongst these are the ambitions laid out in the Bill and the four strategies that underpin the legislation focussed on teaching, standards, targeted support and changes to the schools’ system.

The NNPCF are very concerned about the headline provisions in the bill around attainment, attendance and behaviour. When crude and simplistic approaches are taken, these are areas that can challenge children and young people with SEND. The overarching messages surrounding the Schools’ Bill are very troubling for our membership.

However, within the detailed provisions, there are many measures that we welcome and have been asking for over many years such as promoting an enriched curriculum and access to specialist support. But these more positive messages have been lost in the detail. The headlines around attainment, attendance and behaviour are dominating the agenda and we believe will come to overshadow the implementation of the Bill unless corrected.

The headlines from the Schools’ Bill are very concerning

The NNPCF expressed significant concerns to the DfE on some of the messages being promoted about the proposals, most notably:

Attainment

The White Paper lays out ambitions for attainment at key stage 2 (90% of learners to reach the expected standard in English and Maths) and key stage 4 (a rise in the average GSCE grade for English and Maths from 4.5 to 5). The NNPCF have several concerns with this approach

  • There is a danger that these “ambitions” for the whole system very rapidly become “targets” or “benchmarks” for schools, multi-academy trusts and local authorities. The DfE team took great lengths to emphasise that individual schools, trusts or local authorities will not be held to account for reaching these targets and Ofsted have confirmed that this will not form a part of their inspections. However, the NNPCF believes that these will become de facto measures of success and further incentivise schools to be less inclusive.
  • The focus on academic attainment devalues the more holistic success of many children and young people with SEND. We urged the DfE to look to broader, more individual measures of progress beyond grades.

Behaviour and Attendance

The legislation calls for a “relentless focus on behaviour and attendance”. Again, this poses significant risks for the SEND community:

  • This fails to take into account the underlying causes of behavioural concerns and lower attendance for children and young people with SEND. Unmet needs, blanket policies and emotionally or anxiety based issues are increasing in the SEND community and taking a harder line on behaviour and attendance will entrench existing concerns and cause further issues. Please see our recent post in response to the Attendance Audit by the Children’s Commissioner Children’s Commissioner’s Attendance Audit – National Network of Parent Carer Forums C.I.C (nnpcf.org.uk)

The regulatory system

The schools Bill proposes changes to the regulatory system for multi-academy trusts – namely a shake-up of the regional schools’ commissioners into new regional Educational Directorates with increased powers and the rationalisation of schools regulation into a single common rule book for academies.

  • However, there remains much ambiguity between the role and accountability of individual schools, multi-academy trusts, regional DfE directorates and local authorities. This lack of clarity carries significant risks for the most vulnerable children including those with SEND who may fall through the cracks (as many do now). You can find more on our concerns here The SEND Green Paper: NNPCF briefing – National Network of Parent Carer Forums C.I.C

However, there are some more positive details that we welcome

  • Most importantly, a strong multi-academy trust is defined as one that provides “high quality and inclusive education.” From the outset, we are pleased that there is a recognition that goods schools are inclusive schools.
  • The Bill contains measures for a diverse and enriched curriculum which will benefit many children with SEND in a way that a narrow academically based curriculum limits them.
  • Provisions on mental health and pastoral support are included which are so important to enable many children with SEND to flourish.
  • There are specific requirements on targeted support that is holistic covering academic, pastoral and specialist interventions (or a combination) where needed
  • Increased powers for a local authority to admit a pupil to a specific school
  • Greater controls on cases where pupils are moved between schools

The DfE will be launching a review into the new regulatory system proposed and a consultation into the new statutory pupil movement framework. The DfE agreed to engage with the NNPCF on both these activities.

Categories
consultations Department for Education Education NNPCF work Parent Carer Forums SEND Review

NNPCF launch SEND Green Paper consultation survey for all parent carers.

The NNPCF have recently launched their parent carer survey on the SEND and Alternative Provision Green Paper consultation.

They hope to collect as many responses as possible from all parent carers, not just those who are involved in their local parent carer forums.

The responses of the survey will help to inform the NNPCF’s own response to the SEND Green Paper consultation.

Co-chairs Tina Emery and Mrunal Sisodia stated that, “The Green Paper is an opportunity to reset the SEND system after the 2014 reforms failed to deliver the improvements that families of children with SEND so desperately need. It is vital that every parent carer’s voice is heard and so we have launched a short, simple survey to gather parental views that we will use to inform our response to the Green Paper. We will, of course, also publish the survey results.”

You can complete the survey here: https://www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/J63QX22

The survey should take no more than 10-15 minutes to complete and remains open until the 30 June.

Categories
Bills and legislations Department for Education Education NNPCF work Parent Carer Forums SEND Review

The SEND Green Paper: NNPCF briefing

What does it say and what does the NNPCF think about it?

The NNPCF co-chairs, Tina Emery and Mrunal Sisodia held a briefing on the contents of the long-awaited SEND and Alternative Provision Green Paper consultation for parent carer forums on 23 May.

A recording of the session can now be viewed by following the links below:

YouTube recording of the briefing

Slides from the briefing

Mentimeter survey results

The NNPCF have also published their parent carer survey.

They hope to collect as many responses as possible from all parent carers, not just those who are involved in their local parent carer forums.

The responses of the survey will help to inform the NNPCF’s own response to the SEND Green Paper consultation.

Co-chairs Tina Emery and Mrunal Sisodia stated that, “The Green Paper is an opportunity to reset the SEND system after the 2014 reforms failed to deliver the improvements that families of children with SEND so desperately need. It is vital that every parent carer’s voice is heard and so we have launched a short, simple survey to gather parental views that we will use to inform our response to the Green Paper. We will, of course, also publish the survey results.”

You can complete the survey here: https://www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/J63QX22

The survey should take no more than 10-15 minutes to complete and remains open until the 30 June.

Categories
consultations Department for Education Education Minister for children and families Parent Carer Forums SEND Review

SEND Green Paper engagement events with the Department for Education and parent carer forums

The special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) and alternative provision (AP) consultation was published at the end of March. The NNPCF have been working with the Green Paper team at the Department for Education (DfE) to organise a series of engagement events for parent carer forums to feedback and discuss the plans outlined in the Green Paper.

There are three different categories of events:

A national webinar hosted by NNPCF co-chairs Tina Emery and Mrunal Sisodia – 12 noon 23 May

At this event Mrunal and Tina will share the initial NNPCF response to the proposals. The session will step through the Green Paper outlining which proposals the NNPCF supports and which we have concerns about. The session will be interactive, and we will be seeking flash feedback from parent carer forums on their views of some of the proposals in the Green Paper. We will also outline the different ways that parent carer forums as well as individual parents can respond to the consultation and have their voices heard.

To sign up for this event please use the following link: https://us06web.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZModeCvrTwoGNUve-OwXisL0SQaUniHSchz

Regional events hosted by the Department for Education for Parent Carer Forums

The DfE Green Paper team will be attending NNPCF regional events to share the thinking behind the Green Paper and to have a discussion with regional parent carer groups about their thoughts on the proposals. In these sessions the DfE team will offer a short presentation of 20-30 minutes and then will take feedback and questions relating to the Green Paper for the rest of the hour. The objective of these sessions is to offer parent carer forums the opportunity to have frank and honest exchanges with the DfE team. The sessions will not be recorded due to confidentiality reasons.

The schedule of events is as follows:

RegionDateTimeVirtual or in person meeting
North East26 May11am – 12.30pmVirtual
North West   
Yorkshire and Humber24 May10amIn person York
West Midlands16 May1pmVirtual
East Midlands8 June10amVirtual
East of England12 May10am-2pmIn person – Cambridge
London
16 May 10am-12.30pmVirtual
South East20 May10am-12noonVirtual
South West10 May12:30pm-2pmVirtual (Teams)
Please note, any gaps to the table will be filled once confirmed by the DfE.
Details of how to join these meetings will be sent out through the usual regional parent carer forum channels.

National SEND review briefing hosted by Minister Will Quince

We are currently working with the DfE to organise a national webinar. This will give parent carer forums the opportunity to discuss and feedback to the DfE on the proposals set out in the Green Paper. Children and Families Minister Will Quince will host this event. Once the dates have been confirmed we will publish the webinar, with more information including how to register for the session.

Categories
NHS England

NNPCF concerns about the implementation of the NHS Long Term Plan

The response and recovery from the Covid 19 pandemic and implementation of the NHS Long Term plan are critical to parent carer forums and are key priorities for the NNPCF.

We have been hearing very clear feedback on issues in the health system and around the implementation of the NHS Long Term Plan from parent carer forums and the regions.

NNPCF steering group members Kath Bromfield, Jo Gilliland, Ros Luff, Mrunal Sisodia, met with NHSE leaders Phil Brayshaw and Lorraine Mulroney on 18 March and shared some concerns with them.

1. Capacity across the system to deliver the key LDA projects.

We are aware of several capacity issues which are impacting ability to deliver on some of the key LDA projects. Factors include, in no particular order:

  • Community health services have huge waiting lists
  • Schools are struggling to remain open with the various Covid impacts. This includes staff sick absences and keeping ahead of the DfE contingency plans for exams and any future peaks in the pandemic.
  • Whilst there is willingness to engage with the Autism in Schools project, on a practical note schools may not be able to prioritise this.
  • Parent carers may be under extra demand with their caring responsibilities with children off school with covid related issues.
  • There is pressure on forums time resource where the projects overlap, and it is the same parents involved (see also co-production paragraph).
  • This has been compounded where some projects have been slow to start and are now being rolled out at pace, putting increased pressure on forums.

2. Disconnect between the regional implementation and the national team

There are differences between the national team vision and regional implementation. Whilst this will always be the case due to regional differences, sometimes it seems there is little link up. Regional teams are reporting that whilst the flexibility on how to implement projects is welcome and allows for regional / local implementation, they would appreciate more of a structure and framework on how to implement projects.

3. Quality of coproduction is very varied.

Feedback from forums indicate a very mixed picture around co-producing. Some areas were involved late on in a project whereas others were fully involved from the start.

We have heard that some experienced good co-production or engagement at the early expression of interest stage but then less involved as the project commenced. Some forums report only being involved at an interview stage but not in helping shape the role or service.

The increased use of virtual platforms has given opportunities for parent carers to be involved in a greater number of meetings & events. However, there has been a gradual drift away from involving their voices when organising these meetings. Often these are held at times which clash with school runs and other caring responsibilities. There is also a lack of recognition that parent forums work across partners, and this can lead to unreasonable expectation regarding availability.

There can be high expectations placed on parents to deliver presentations etc, often at very short notice.

One of the issues which impacts opportunity for good engagement or co production is that many health partners do not understand the nature of parent forums. i.e. forums are neither a supplier nor individual patient advisers. This issue is impacted further by high churn of staff.

On points 1-3 we agreed with Phil and Lorraine that we would work with the NHS LDA and SEND leads to coproduce a national, regional and local model of engagement and coproduction

4. Designated Clinical Officer / Medical Officer

DCO / DMO role remains very variable across the country. The resourcing issues post Covid and the move to ICS Integrated Care Systems is exacerbating these differences.

The roll out of ICS’s along with the changes has served to push SEND to a lower priority. It is hard for forums to keep abreast with the changes and navigate the new structure. This can also result in staff changes where relationships & understanding of forums need to be rebuilt.

Lorraine agreed to work with her SEND leads to cascade the key requirements of coproduction to the DCO

5. Strain on services in the wake of the pandemic

The pandemic has exacerbated the pressures on community health services (therapies, CAMHS, paediatricians). The already lengthy waiting lists have increased with higher demand from cohorts who are new to the services. This is causing extreme stress and increased harms in the system with families often waiting over 6 months for basic services

The loss or reduction of service during the pandemic has seen some of the existing users deteriorating and needing more specialised services. This is further impacted by many targeted / specialist services being on hold.

As a result of extra pressures in the system there is a struggle for services to manage EHCP and annual review workload. In turn, it is likely there will be greater demand for EHCPs and more looking to tribunal to obtain support.

Lorraine updated that work is ongoing at the senior levels of government to address these issues. She agreed to host a webinar in June to update parent carer forums. This has been scheduled for noon on 7th June.

Register in advance for this meeting:

https://us06web.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZUkc-2vrDopHdRMCCc73dx_tDaFZrcUEnW6

After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the meeting.

Categories
consultations Department for Education SEND Review

Latest developments on the SEND Review

NNPCF to join SEND review steering group

The SEND review has now been running for over 2 years and there has been increasing frustration and speculation about the progress of the work.

When the review was set up in 2019, we were not invited to join the review in a formal capacity. At the time, we highlighted the review would lack legitimacy without direct parental input.

However, we have now been asked to join the SEND review steering group. Because we continue to believe that coproduction and a strong family voice is essential, we have decided to accept the invitation.

We will be sharing the same messages we have been for the last two years

Even though, we haven’t been a formal member of the review until now, we have made strong and consistent representations into the review for the past two years.

 In its initial phases in 2019 we arranged a series of local, regional and national events to ensure that the parent-carer voice was heard by the SEND team and insisted that parents should have simple routes to contribute. You can find our representations on WHAT needed to change here: NNPCF conference gives SEND Review seven clear messages – National Network of Parent Carer Forums C.I.C

After this, we have continued to work on our input into the review (via the many groups, boards, and established relationships we have access to) and in March 2021, we presented a webinar at our conference on HOW we should deliver the improved outcomes for children and young people with SEND through changing minimum standards, funding, accountability and reporting in the SEND system. You can find this webinar here: NNPCF input into the SEND review – YouTube. The presentation is here Microsoft PowerPoint – NNPCF input in to the SEND review.

We will continue to be transparent and seek to work with colleagues in the SEND sector to influence the review

We have met with other SEND groups including the Special Educational Consortium, the Disabled Children’s Partnership and the Let us Learn Too campaign – all of these groups are asking for similar changes to the system as the NNPCF. These and other groups also do important work representing families. We believe these messages should be heard through as many channels as possible via both campaigning and coproduction

Categories
Department for Education Minister for children and families

Minister Ford’s open letter on return to school

Children and Families Minister Vicky Ford has put out an open letter to all families on the return to school.