Categories
NNPCF work SEND Implementation Plan Uncategorized

SEND Mediation Standards consultation

We have been asked to share the following information from the SEND Dispute Resolution Steering Group.

The College of Mediators (COM) and the Civil Mediation Council (CMC) hold a joint register of accredited SEND mediators.

This comes about as a result of standards specific to SEND mediation practice that were drawn up by a panel of providers in 2018. In a changing mediation environment and in the context of governmental change to SEND provision, these standards are now currently being reviewed with a view to ensuring that SEND mediation continues to be delivered to a consistently high standard.

When the standards were originally drawn up the expectation was that they would be applicable to experienced mediators working in other fields, who might extend their practice to SEND disputes.

These new standards will have a wider ranging application, extending to those who are newly trained as mediators and who may, for example, be moving into mediation from a background in SEND and /or education.

The standards will apply to those who wish to apply to join the register. Those SEND mediators who are already on the register will not need to re-apply, but will need to demonstrate the annual CPD and practice requirements going forward.

As part of this review therefore, the standards have been revised and are now being circulated among mediators and other professionals working in the SEND context.

You can read the revised standards below:

Professional_Standards_for_SEND-Mediators_draft_January_2024_for_consultation.pdf (civilmediation.org)

We welcome your views on the standards document generally and in particular we would value your responses to the questions outlined in the following consultation: Consultation re SEND Mediation Standards (smartsurvey.co.uk)

Categories
Children's Commissioner SEND Implementation Plan

Commissioner calls for radical rehaul of the SEND system

The Children’s Commissioner has expressed her concerns about lack of support for children with Special Educational Needs in mainstream education and long waiting times for EHCPs as demand reaches new highs.

The NNPCF, welcome this report, which has confirmed what we have said for quite some time, that the 2014 reforms had good intentions, but issues with the systems around those reforms meant that delivery wasn’t carried out to everyone’s expectations.

The government has looked at the SEND system and the SEND AP implementation plan and been born out of that consultation. We recognise it will take a while to unpick this, trial changes and make any legislative changes needed.

However, we know from our membership that families are already missing important opportunities.

We remain solution focused and committed to work with our partners towards the aims set out by the SEND AP Implementation Plan.

However we do have concerns about the impact on families while this is achieved.

Find out more on the Children’s Commissioner’s website: https://www.childrenscommissioner.gov.uk/blog/commissioner-calls-for-radical-rehaul-of-the-send-system/?fbclid=IwAR3lV6FqSrbZWaVSBhk1y8RqAAb6LsV7ap3Zk8hGjBKncdVOJhz8_7USn3c

Categories
DfE NNPCF work SEND AP Implementation Board. SENDAP

SEND AP Implementation Board

Co-chairs Tina Emery, Mrunal Sisodia, with the incoming co-chair Sarah Clarke, recently met with SEND AP Implementation Board. Which was chaired by Minster Claire Coutinho. This was the first meeting to be held.

The Board will be jointly chaired by the children’s Minster Claire Coutinho and the mental health Minster Maria Caulfield. 

The Board is made up of various experts across the SEND sector to offer support, challenge and solutions to the work set out in the Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND) and Alternative Provision (AP) improvement plan 

The Board will be responsible for challenging the priority areas of work and supporting the rigor and pace that is required for progression of improvement plan.

The priorities of areas of work discussed at the meeting were:

  • The importance of Local Plans and Partnerships which determine the priorities of an area across all sectors to successfully deliver the plans for improvements. The NNPCF raised the need for Parent Carer Forums and the lived experience to be central to these discussions, so that improvements were coproduced.
  • National Standards and their role in reducing post code lotteries across education and health services ensuring consistent high quality support.  The need for a clear understanding of what ‘good’ looked like and importance of that shared national understanding was also discussed.
  • How workforce capacity and capability played a vital role in determining that there is sufficient workforce in the right areas to support change.
  • The standardisation and digitisation of the EHCP process and the requirements required to implement successfully.

National SEND and alternative provision implementation board – GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)

Categories
Department for Education Government NNPCF NNPCF work SEND Review SENDAP

Special Educational Needs and Disability and Alternative Provision (SENDAP) Improvement Plan published

Today, the government has published its long awaited response to the SEND Green Paper, the SENDAP Improvement Plan.

The plan outlines the steps that the government will be taking over the next few years to address the problems in the SEND system that have resulted in poor experiences for many children, young people (CYP) and families. The plan follows the SEND Green Paper and the subsequent consultation conducted by the Department for Education (DfE) in 2022. Our NNPCF co-chairs Tina Emery and Mrunal Sisodia were part of the steering group that advised on and reviewed the Green Paper and drafts of this plan.

On its publication, NNPCF Co-chairs, Tina Emery and Mrunal Sisodia said,

”There is much to welcome in the SENDAP Implementation Plan, in particular, we are pleased to see that national standards will form the basis of ordinarily available provision, have such a prominent role. The NNPCF argued for the need for national standards during the SEND review and 90% of respondents to our survey agreed that they were needed. If implemented well, national standards will form the basis of early intervention and clearly identify who is responsible for providing and paying for services.

Similarly, we are pleased to see local inclusion partnerships and plans being taken forward. Linked to the new Ofsted / CQC local area inspection framework that includes an annual review of inclusion plans, these will drive the joined up working and commissioning that has so often been missing.

Some of the proposals that the NNPCF disagreed with, notably the tailored list of settings, mandatory mediation and bandings and tariffs remain in the plan. However, we are pleased that these areas are being reviewed and piloted before implementation decisions are made.

Unfortunately, in some areas, the plan does not go as far as we would want. In the absence of legislation, the accountability regime, the mix of responsibilities, powers and regulation between schools, multi-academy trusts, local authorities and the DfE Regions Group – remains unclear.

We urge the ongoing Academies Regulation and Commissioning Review to address these gaps. In addition, we remain concerned about the pace of change. It will be 2030 before this plan is fully implemented and this is literally a childhood since the original SEND reforms in the Children and Families Act 2014.

We, the NNPCF, will continue work with government and NHSE to ensure that urgency to address the problems in the SEND system remains a priority.”

There are many things in the Implementation Plan that the NNPCF welcome:

National standards to form the basis of ordinarily available provision. Properly implemented, national standards will drive early intervention and form the foundation of what families can expect from services, what services can expect from each other as well as who is responsible for delivering and paying. In our survey 90% of respondents were in favour of national standards. We have received assurances from ministers that national standards will not be a list prescribed or allowed services for a list of diagnoses. Also, national standards will not form a cap on what can be provided to meet needs, individual needs must still be met.

SEND and AP partnerships and local inclusion plans will require local areas to have a clear and shared understanding of the needs of the local population and work together to address them. We are pleased that these will be reviewed annually as a part of the Ofsted / CQC local area inspection regime. In our survey, respondents were clear that education, health and care services needed to work together more actively and comply with national standards

The sections on the development of the SEND workforce, both inside and outside of schools are very welcome.  In our survey, 97% of respondents said that teaching staff needed better training on SEND.

We called for better data on SEND to drive inclusion and incentivise local areas to identify needs and provide early help. The inclusion dashboards proposed will do this if properly designed.

The proposed Adjustments Passport to support disabled young people into work is something that the NNPCF has been asking for over the last five years

We are pleased that some of the lessons of 2014 have been learnt. There will be a properly constituted change programme to systemically implement the plan with meaningful review and accountability through regional expert partnerships and a new National SENDAP Implementation Board.

However, there are some areas included in the plan that we continue to have reservations about. We have noted that these areas are going to be piloted and tested through the regional expert partnerships:

  • The tailored list of settings remains in the plan despite being supported by only 20% of respondents in our survey.
  • Mandatory mediation has very mixed support – we have expressed concern about the mechanism for mandatory mediation and the risk that this denies or delays access to redress via the tribunal.
  • Similarly, our survey showed no clear support for bandings and tariffs with only 47% or responses in favour.

Unfortunately, there are many areas that remain very worrying for the NNPCF, where more clarity is required:

The accountability regime remains ambiguous. The division of powers, responsibilities, regulation and enforcement between schools, multi-academy trusts, local authorities and the DfE Regions Group remain unclear. We hear too often about schools that do not make reasonable adjustments or promote inclusion. Parents and local authorities are powerless to hold them to account. The ongoing Academies Regulation and Commissioning Review must close these gaps to ensure that schools, local authorities and Integrated Care Systems meet needs.

When the SENDAP Green Paper and Schools White Paper were launched in March 2022 , the intention was to support both with legislation. Now, this will not happen. Without legislation, we are concerned that some of the measures critical to success can no longer be made mandatory (e.g. national standards and greater accountability for schools).

Finally, the pace of change must not lose urgency. There are many areas of the plan that require further development and definition. We welcome the intention to coproduce key elements and we look to supporting partners to achieve this in the most expedient way. We must collectively ensure that this work is given the priority our SEND families deserve.

The SEND system is in crisis now and we need urgent progress and action.

For more background on the SENDAP implementation plan and the NNPCF input in the Green Paper and consultation please see:

NNPCF response to the SEND Green Paper and Alternative Provision consultation. – National Network of Parent Carer Forums C.I.C

Find out what parent carers have told us about the SEND Green Paper and coproduce the NNPCF consultation – YouTube

SEND-review-results-NNPCF-2022.pdf